Individual Opinions-Based Judgment Aggregation Procedures
نویسندگان
چکیده
Judgment aggregation is a recent formal discipline that studies how to aggregate individual judgments on logically connected propositions to form collective decisions on the same propositions. Despite the apparent simplicity of the problem, the aggregation of individual judgments can result in an inconsistent outcome. This seriously troubles this research field. Expert panels, legal courts, boards, and councils are only some examples of group decision situations that confront themselves with such aggregation problems. So far, the existing framework and procedures considered in the literature are idealized. Our goal is to enrich standard judgment aggregation by allowing the individuals to agree or disagree on the decision rule. Moreover, the group members have the possibility to abstain or express neutral judgments. This provides a more realistic framework and, at the same time, consents the definition of an aggregation procedure that escapes the inconsistent group outcome.
منابع مشابه
Complexity Results for Aggregating Judgments using Scoring or Distance-Based Procedures
Judgment aggregation is an abstract framework for studying collective decision making by aggregating individual opinions on logically related issues. Important types of judgment aggregation methods are those of scoring and distance-based methods, many of which can be seen as generalisations of voting rules. An important question to investigate for judgment aggregation methods is how hard it is ...
متن کاملDistance-Based Judgment Aggregation of Three-Valued Judgments with Weights
Judgment aggregation theory studies how to amalgamate individual opinions on a set of logically related issues into a set of collective opinions. Aggregation rules proposed in the literature are sparse. All proposed rules consider only two-valued judgments, thus imposing the strong requirement that an agent cannot abstain from giving judgments on any of the issues. All proposed rules are also i...
متن کاملDistance-based rules for weighted judgment aggregation
Cooperating agents need to reach group decisions on several logically related issues. These decision-making problems are studied in social choice theory by the discipline of judgment aggregation. Judgment aggregation produces group decisions by aggregating individual answers to binary questions, however existing aggregation rules are defined for a very restricted setting, insufficient for aggre...
متن کاملJudgment Aggregation in Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments
Judgment Aggregation studies how agents take a collective decision on a certain number of issues based on their individual opinions. In recent years, a line of research in Judgment Aggregation investigates how to model this framework within a logical calculus — usually designed ad hoc for this purpose. By contrast, in this thesis we show how it is possible to translate any aggregation problem f...
متن کاملIndependence in judgment aggregation
Judgment aggregation is a rapidly developing research area in economics which attracts the interest of several fields, such as law, political science and philosophy [3]. It studies how the individual opinions of an agent, which are opinions on logically interconnected propositions, can be mapped into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Dietrich and List showed that judgment aggregat...
متن کامل